Pārlūkot izejas kodu

matrices

tags/CANDIDATE
gtheler pirms 7 gadiem
vecāks
revīzija
9b135d0e04
3 mainītis faili ar 5 papildinājumiem un 1 dzēšanām
  1. +5
    -1
      nafems4.md
  2. Binārs
      test1.png
  3. Binārs
      test2.png

+ 5
- 1
nafems4.md Parādīt failu

@@ -697,7 +697,11 @@ You can get both the exponential nature of each added bullet and how easily we c
Error in the computation of the linearised stresses vs. CPU time needed to solve the problem using FEM
:::::

The last two bullets lead to an issue that has come many times when discussing the issue of convergence with respect to the mesh size with other colleagues. There apparently exists a common misunderstanding that the number of _elements_ is the main parameter that defines how complex a FEM model is. I have seen a lot of graphs where a certain result is plotted against the number of elements
The last two bullets lead to an issue that has come many times when discussing the issue of convergence with respect to the mesh size with other colleagues. There apparently exists a common misunderstanding that the number of _elements_ is the main parameter that defines how complex a FEM model is.

meshing, building, solving, stress

matrices test

## ASME stress linearisation (not linearity!)


Binārs
test1.png Parādīt failu

Pirms Pēc
Platums: 632  |  Augstums: 632  |  Izmērs: 41KB

Binārs
test2.png Parādīt failu

Pirms Pēc
Platums: 640  |  Augstums: 640  |  Izmērs: 73KB

Notiek ielāde…
Atcelt
Saglabāt