瀏覽代碼

matrices

tags/CANDIDATE
gtheler 7 年之前
父節點
當前提交
9b135d0e04
共有 3 個文件被更改,包括 5 次插入1 次删除
  1. +5
    -1
      nafems4.md
  2. 二進制
      test1.png
  3. 二進制
      test2.png

+ 5
- 1
nafems4.md 查看文件

@@ -697,7 +697,11 @@ You can get both the exponential nature of each added bullet and how easily we c
Error in the computation of the linearised stresses vs. CPU time needed to solve the problem using FEM
:::::

The last two bullets lead to an issue that has come many times when discussing the issue of convergence with respect to the mesh size with other colleagues. There apparently exists a common misunderstanding that the number of _elements_ is the main parameter that defines how complex a FEM model is. I have seen a lot of graphs where a certain result is plotted against the number of elements
The last two bullets lead to an issue that has come many times when discussing the issue of convergence with respect to the mesh size with other colleagues. There apparently exists a common misunderstanding that the number of _elements_ is the main parameter that defines how complex a FEM model is.

meshing, building, solving, stress

matrices test

## ASME stress linearisation (not linearity!)


二進制
test1.png 查看文件

Before After
Width: 632  |  Height: 632  |  Size: 41KB

二進制
test2.png 查看文件

Before After
Width: 640  |  Height: 640  |  Size: 73KB

Loading…
取消
儲存